Saturday, June 1, 2019


June 01, 2019 Saturday

Bedtime Story 


The Seven Sins of the Indian Judiciary


Justice Ruma Pal called them the seven sins (probably and most likely based on the seven human vices as considered within Christian teachings) and listed them out as follows:

(1.) Turning a blind eye to the injudicious conduct of a colleague

(2.) Hypocrisy – a complete distortion of the norm of judicial independence

(3.) Secrecy – the simple and well known fact in the legal fraternity is that there is almost no aspect of judicial procedure and conduct - which includes the appointment of High Court and Supreme Court Judges - that is transparent

Almost everything about judiciary is shrouded under a cloak of secrecy in the guise of judiciary independence

(4.) Plagiarism and prolixity – there are two accusations or sins being made in this fourth point

One is that it has been found quite often that the Supreme Court judges pick and lift out whole passages from the judgments of their predecessors and stick them on their pronouncements without openly acknowledging it.

This according me need not be considered to be such a serious allegation for after all following precedence is the basis of common law legal system.       

The second accusation within the fourth sin is that exasperating use of long-winded and uncalled for verboseness in their judgments to the extent that they become a subject of literary work as much as a legal treatise.

(5.) Self arrogance – There exists a feeling among the judges (perhaps as in the armed forces) that they are superior to the rest, more noble, more virtuous and exemplary than the rest in spite of the fact that the men and women in the judiciary come from the same lot that comprise average apes.

Under this guise of self-proclaimed nobility and virtuosity and of course their independence the judges have great latitude and leverage in hiding their own shortcomings, indiscipline and transgression of norms and procedures.      

(6.) Professional arrogance – judges of the courts are supposed to read the matter or the cases listed for the day which is called doing their homework.

It is somewhat like a surgeon who has to operate needs to read through the case file of the patients just to be sure what, where and how he will be tackling the surgery.

It is not uncommon for judges not to do their homework and then arrive at their decisions which often have far-reaching consequence affecting tens, hundreds, thousands and sometimes tens of thousands of people without following the precedent.

After some years this feeling of arrogance sets so well that it precludes them from hard work and reading and learning of the previous and new case laws.

(7.) Nepotism – this vice comes in various flavors the most common being that just like in politics, medical profession or in Bollywood, the son often tends to get the advantage of his father’s position.       

Stay tuned to the voice of an average story storytelling chimpanzee or login at http://panarrans.blogspot.com
                              
Good night Mon Ami and my fellow cousin ape.
                           
  
                

             












Advertisements

Another great educator and a teacher that I am aware of is Professor Subhashish Chattopadhyay in Bangalore, India.

While I narrate stories, Professor Subhashish an electronic engineer and a former professor at BARC, does and teaches real mathematics and physics.

He started the participation of Indian students at the International Physics Olympiad.

Do visit him here:


All his books can be downloaded for free through this link:


For edutainment and English education of your children, I recommend this large collection of Halloween Songs for Kids:


No comments:

Post a Comment