Sunday, January 20, 2019


January 20, 2019 Sunday

Bedtime Story 


Karl Popper's Characteristics


Last night I had introduced to you the first of the seven characteristics that Karl Popper had proposed to consider any theory (or any statement in general) to be scientific.

The rest of the six will follow suit.

Mind you that these ideas though were proposed specifically for people engaged in science and research I think they can serve as useful tools to be applied broadly in our everyday lives.

(2) Confirmations should count only if they are the result of risky predictions; that is to say, if, unenlightened by the theory in question, we should have expected an event which was incompatible with the theory – an event which would have refuted the theory.

(3) Every “good” scientific theory is a prohibition: it forbids certain things to happen.

The more a theory forbids, the better it is.

(4) A theory which is not refutable by any conceivable agent is non-scientific.

Irrefutability is not a virtue of a theory (as people often think) but a vice.

(5) Every genuine test of a theory is an attempt to falsify it, or to refute it.

Testability is falsifiability; but there are degrees of testability: some theories are more testable, more exposed to refutation, than others; they take, as it were, greater risks.

(6) Confirming evidence should not count except when it is the result of the genuine test of the theory; and this means that it can be presented as a serious but unsuccessful attempt to falsify they theory.

(I now speak in such cases of “corroborating evidence”.)

(7) Some genuinely testable theories, when found to be false, might still be upheld by their admirers – for example by introducing post hoc (after the fact) some auxiliary hypothesis or assumption, or by reinterpreting the theory post hoc in such a way that it escapes refutation.  

Such a procedure is always possible, but it rescues the theory from refutation only at the cost of destroying, or at least, lowering its scientific status, by tampering with evidence.

The temptation to tamper can be minimized by first taking the time to write down the testing protocol before embarking on the scientific work.

Even though it appears that in comparison to other scientists Popper over emphasized the idea of falsification in scientific theories (and for which he has been criticized by them) the essential message and the wisdom must not be lost.

It is, in fact, not lost as we will see in the nights to come the number of experimental tests that general relativity has been subjected to and is being subjected till this very day.  
           
The tests that general relativity has been submitted to are divided into classical tests, modern tests, strong field tests and cosmological tests.

Stay tuned to the voice of an average story storytelling chimpanzee or login at http://panarrans.blogspot.com
                              
Good night Mon Ami and my fellow cousin ape.
                           
  
                

             












Advertisements

Another great educator and a teacher that I am aware of is Professor Subhashish Chattopadhyay in Bangalore, India.

While I narrate stories, Professor Subhashish an electronic engineer and a former professor at BARC, does and teaches real mathematics and physics.

He started the participation of Indian students at the International Physics Olympiad.

Do visit him here:


All his books can be downloaded for free through this link:


For edutainment and English education of your children, I recommend this large collection of Halloween Songs for Kids:



No comments:

Post a Comment