Wednesday, May 23, 2018

May 23, 2018 Wednesday

Bedtime Story 


Alan Turing had Definitely Read Luigi Menabrea and Ada Lovelace


The work of both Ada Lovelace and Charles Babbage was rediscovered when the world caught up with their ideas and when programming came to be better understood in 1940s.

It was a British scientist by the name of Bertram Bowden who later went on to become Minister of Science and Education (alas what a rarity for a scientist to enter mainstream politics and then continuing to be a rational and scientific man!) who while collecting material for his 1953 book ‘Faster than Thought: A Symposium on digital Computing Machines’ came to meet Ada’s granddaughter.

This lovely young lady was very generous and supplied Bowden all the papers that she possessed of her enchanting grandmother.

Thus began the gradual revival of a lost generation of geniuses that would almost certainly not have found any place in my bedtime story had it been not for Bertram Bowden.

One person who certainly did not miss out on Ada Lovelace and her work was the great Alan Turing who in his 1950 paper titled ‘Computing Machinery and Intelligence’ coined the phrase ‘Lady Lovelace’s Objection’ quoting the following lines of hers in his paper:

“The Analytical Engine has no pretensions to originate anything.     

It can do whatever we know how to order it to perform.”

These two statements are the first two sentences of the second paragraph of the Note G which certifies that Turing would certainly have read the masterpiece of both Luigi Menabrea followed by all the Notes of Lovelace from A through G.

In this paper Turing essentially deals with the problem of intelligence of computing machines and poses the question at the very beginning: ‘Can machines think?’

In the paper he plays the devil’s advocate (this is so because I am acutely aware of his views on both machines and human apes) lists out the following nine arguments why it can be objected to ever considering computing machines as to be thinking devices:

(1) The Theological Objection

(2) The ‘Heads in the Sand’ Objection

(3) The Mathematical Objection

(4) The Argument from Consciousness

(5) Arguments from Various Disabilities

(6) Lady Lovelace’s Objection

(7) Argument from Continuity in the Nervous System

(8) The Argument from Informality of Behavior

(9)  The Argument from Extra-Sensory Perception 

It is a beautiful non-mathematical paper (I promise you, not a single equation, though at one point it just has two grids of numbers that are more in the line of logic gates than mathematical digits) that displays in full glory almost a clairvoyance-like thought processes that this mathematical logician had.  

Stay tuned to the voice of an average story storytelling chimpanzee or login at http://panarrans.blogspot.com
                              
Good night Mon Ami and my fellow cousin ape.
                           
  
                

             












Advertisements

Another great educator and a teacher that I am aware of is Professor Subhashish Chattopadhyay in Bangalore, India.

While I narrate stories, Professor Subhashish an electronic engineer and a former professor at BARC, does and teaches real mathematics and physics.

He started the participation of Indian students at the International Physics Olympiad.

Do visit him here:


All his books can be downloaded for free through this link:


For edutainment and English education of your children, I recommend this large collection of Halloween Songs for Kids:



No comments:

Post a Comment