Thursday, August 24, 2017

August 24, 2017 Thursday

Bedtime Story 


Unwanted Consequence of Nihilistic Approach


To show the unwanted consequence of taking nihilistic approach to the word “true” Tarski gave the following example.

Consider for a moment an ancient mathematician who is long since dead has published lots of serious papers.

In all his work there is one certain term that keeps repeating that is open to different interpretations in different places.

Now there is a mathematician existing in the present who also happens to be a historian who comes across the works of this great guy who is long since gone.

After studying all the works assiduously, the historian mathematician comes to the conclusion that under one of the interpretations of that term, all the theorems worked out by the past mathematician turn out to be true.

This means that all the proofs turn out to be valid.

Now it is obvious that this historian mathematician would consider this interpretation of that specific term as true.

In that case he might even stick his neck out and make a claim that any future mathematician who uses this term in its same interpretation would also eventually end up in proving his theorems.

Yet if our historian mathematician wants to be very formal and adopts his new nihilistic approach, then he would not allow himself to make this conjecture.

So what has this truth-theoretical nihilism has unwittingly done?

It has alienated the very conceptual notion of truth from our mind.

So we are back to our old quandary.

There has to be a solution to the problem of notion of truth such that it will not rock the classical concept of truth and yet not allow such paradoxes such as Liar to arise.

For this to happen, there has to applied some restrictions on the notion of truth yet at the same time keeping it available for the purpose of intellectual discussions.

We need to go back once again to the Liar Paradox and examine it closely.

What is it that actually generates the paradox?

To be more precise, what is or are the features of common natural language that gives origin to the antinomy.

Tarski says that one feature that starkly stands out of the natural languages is their universality.

The all tend to be all-comprehensive and that is exactly the basic intent of any common natural language.

It is the very medium that allows to express anything and everything that is capable of being expressed.

To fulfill this requirement, its vocabulary is constantly expanding.

A natural language has linguistic objects and semantic terms.

Stay tuned to the voice of an average story storytelling chimpanzee or login at http://panarrans.blogspot.com
                              
Good night mon ami and my fellow cousin ape.
                           
  
                

             












Advertisements

Another great educator and a teacher that I am aware of is Professor Subhashish Chattopadhyay in Bangalore, India.

While I narrate stories, Professor Subhashish an electronic engineer and a former professor at BARC, does and teaches real mathematics and physics.

He started the participation of Indian students at the International Physics Olympiad.

Do visit him here:


All his books can be downloaded for free through this link:


For edutainment and English education of your children, I recommend this large collection of Halloween Songs for Kids:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCd14DRdYKj454znayUIfcAg

No comments:

Post a Comment